InFigure 3 and Figure 4 we can see the grille design of the Outlaw Audio BLSv2and its effect on the response. Theeffects of the grille are evident but not severe on this excellent loudspeaker.This grille design isn’t acoustically invisible, but it isn’t an especially badgrille with respect to its effects on the response. One thing that sets thisgrille apart from others is that, as we mentioned in the review, it is reallytough and does a superb job of protecting the drivers. Since the grille framehere is very slight, the major contributor to the grille’s deformation on theresponse may be comb-filtering from the perforation pattern of the metalgrille. It should also be noted that the audibility of this effect on theresponse is very much in question since diffraction effects are not likesteady-state resonances. This is discussed further below.

Character logo design free. Figure 5. Dayton Audio MK402 grille.

Sound diffraction examples music

Figure 6. Dayton Audio MK402responses with and without the grille.

Figure5 and 6 show the grille design of the Dayton Audio MK402 and its effects on thedirect response. Thegrilles use ½” thick MDF and do constrict the tweeter a bit. This isdoubtlessly causing the very substantial dip just a bit over 6 kHz. As we willdiscuss below, this may not be causing as significantly audible effect on thisresponse as would appear from the graph.

Figure 7. Philharmonic Audio BMRPhilharmonitor grille.

Figure 8. Philharmonic Audio BMRPhilharmonitor response with and without the grille.

Figures7 and 8 show the grille design of the Philharmonic Audio BMR Philharmonitorandits effects on the direct response.While the grille frame of the BMR Philharmonitor does keep its distance fromthe drivers, it is relatively thick and that is clearly having an effect onthe response. Again, the audibility of diffraction is not likely to be aserious matter, as we will now discuss.

Impacts of Sound from Grille Diffraction

diffraction effects are significantly more audible in the nearfield than the farfield of the speaker.
Nowlet’s talk about the impact on the sound from the diffraction effects ofgrilles. One complication is that the angle and distance from the speaker willsomewhat change the frequencies where these diffraction effects occur at. Thesum total output of the speaker per frequency is not changed, but the outputper frequency does become modified depending on distance and angle. Since theoverall acoustic energy generated by the speaker per frequency remains the same,and also since much of what we normally hear from the loudspeaker is not justdirect sound from the speaker itself but also the many acoustic reflectionsfrom the various surfaces of typical rooms, baffle diffractions effects may notbe significantly audible in ordinary listening situations unless it is severe.Whatever the audibility if diffraction effects, in practice they are going tobe more significant in the near-field than in the more reverberant far-field,since grille/baffle diffraction does not affect the speaker’s total acousticpower output. The audibility ofdiffraction is even more questionable in modern speakers that have relativelynarrow cabinets. The point here is that while we can easily see the effects ofthe extra diffraction from grilles in these graphs that were measured inquasi-anechoic conditions, the effects would likely not be easily heard amidstin the acoustic conditions of ordinary in-room listening situations. What youhear from a sound system in a domestic environment is far more complex thanwhat a microphone picks up in a reflection-free environment, and thediffraction effects of grilles would be more subtle.

Figure 9. InfinityPrimus P153 grille/no grille amplitude difference per angle

Figure 10. InfinityPrimus P153 responseswith and without the grille.

Toget a more detailed look at how diffraction can affect the response, we took anInfinity Primus P153 and measured its horizontal response from a direct axisangle out to a 90-degree angle in five-degree increments with both the grilleon and grille off. We choose the P153 for this because its grille differencesare not as deleterious as many other speakers we had on hand, and we thought itwould be better to show the kind of difference that a grille makes in arelatively good case; its responses with and without grille are shown in Figure10. The grille for the Primus P153 is shown in Figure 2. The graph in Figure 9shows the difference in amplitudethat is caused by the use of the grille, so the areas where the curves stayclose to zero on the vertical scale means that the grille isn’t causing anysignificant changes. However, areas where there is lots of fluctuation on thevertical scale mean that the grille is having a greater effect. We can see thatup to just under 2 kHz, the grille is not doing much to the speaker’s response.Above 2.5 kHz, the grille’s effects become more prominent, and as we near 20kHz, the grille is causing around 5 dB changes in amplitude. If we lookclosely, we can also see that the effects become more severe the further wemove from the direct axis. This is a relatively benign grille, but we can stillsee how it is altering the sound. But again, we will repeat for emphasis: thislooks much worse than it sounds.
Whilegrille diffraction isn’t likely to be a major blight on the sound quality, thatisn’t necessarily to say that the increased diffraction would be totallyinaudible. A study conducted by Earl Geddes and Lidia Lee suggests thatdiffraction-like effects are audible, and that human hearing can perceive it asa nonlinear distortion since its presence increases in audibility as amplitudeis raised1. It isn’t clear how muchthis research pertains to the amount of diffraction that typical grilles cancause, but it does prevent us from declaring it to be absolutelyinconsequential.

Audible Effects of Speaker Placement Near Adjacent Surfaces

actual bookshelves are not a good location to placebookshelf speakers.
Whatis likely a much greater source of diffraction in many setups is nearby objectsand surfaces. For example, if you place your speakers in a shelf space such asin a bookshelf slot or cubby, as is shown in Figure 12, the acoustic effects ofthat are inevitably going to be far more damaging on the sound than almost anygrille (ironically, actual bookshelves are not a good location to placebookshelf speakers). The surrounding surfaces in the cubby is certain to be asource of destructive reflections, especially if the speaker is pushed far backinto the cavity. If your speaker is placed recessed on a shelf, desk, or tablewhere there is a significant amount of surface space immediately under thespeaker, as is shown in Figure 11, that is going to cause much worse problemsthan almost any grille. A lot of acoustic energy will reflect off of thetabletop surface to negatively impact combine with the direct sound of thespeaker. Another common placement that will cause a lot of diffraction is ifyou place your speaker right next to a wall or in a corner, as is shown inFigures 13 and 14, because that will do substantially greater damage to thesound quality than a grille ever could in the same way as Figure 11 but atdifferent angles. If you want to get the best sound out of your speakers,placement will count for a lot more than the use of the grille. Give yourspeakers some breathing room away from walls and corners and keep them awayfrom surfaces. Also, have as few obstructions between you and the speaker aspossible.

Figure 11 (left) and Figure 12(right). Shelf space in front of the speaker will be a major source ofdiffraction in Figure 11.

Surrounding surfaces in the bookshelf will alsocreate a lot of diffraction in Figure 12.

Figure 13 (left) and Figure 14(right).
Lg tv wont mirror iphone 11.

Placing speakers next to walls and in corners creates all kinds ofacoustic problems, including diffraction effects that are bound to be much moresignificant than almost any grille.

Conclusion

Beforeclosing our discussion of the effects of loudspeaker grilles, we shouldemphasize something we mentioned at the beginning of this article that whilemost speakers are designed to produce the best sound without grilles andtherefore only provide grilles as a protective component that does compromisethe sound, some speakers were engineered with the intention of grille use andhave designed their speaker’s sound accordingly, such as Vandersteen’s speakersand the Paradigm Premier speakers that we dealt with recently.They do so by factoring in the grille frame as a part of the design and adjustthe cabinet and crossover accordingly. In our experience, this is not the norm,but it can happen. Those who want to know for sure about a certain speakermodel are advised to get in contact with the loudspeaker’s engineers for the best answer.
Inthe end, the question of whether the speakers will sound better with or withoutgrilles leans toward the answer that most speakers technically perform betterwithout grilles, but it can vary with speaker, and also the difference willlikely be a subtle one if it can be heard at all.
Let us know in the related forum thread below how you listen to your speakers: Grilles On or Grilles Off?
1Geddes, Earl R., andLidia W. Lee. 'Audibility of linear distortion with variations in soundpressure level and group delay.'

См. также в других словарях:

Diffraction examples in sound

Книги

Другие книги по запросу «acoustic diffraction» >>

Sound Diffraction Examples Energy